Commercial Drift

Drift Begins With Reasonable Decisions

Commercial drift rarely develops because someone makes an obviously bad decision. More often, it emerges through a series of reasonable decisions made by capable people, each responding logically to the priorities and information in front of them.

​

Sales pursues revenue. Marketing generates visibility. Product responds to customer requests. Operations improves efficiency. Finance controls costs. Leadership sets annual growth targets.

​

Individually, each decision can be justified. But commercial performance is not determined by whether decisions make sense in isolation. It is determined by whether those decisions collectively reinforce a coherent commercial direction. When they stop doing so, the organisation begins to drift — and because everyone remains busy, the drift can remain almost invisible.

​

Until something exposes it.

​

Success Can Conceal Commercial Fragility

Commercial drift is particularly difficult to recognise during periods of apparent success. Early wins validate decisions. Revenue grows. Teams expand. Processes develop around what has worked. Expectations rise. The natural assumption is that the commercial model is sound.

​

And perhaps it is — but growth can also conceal vulnerabilities that become increasingly important as the organisation scales.

​

I have seen this in practice.

​

Industry events were attended partly because competitors were there while significant effort was directed towards large pharmaceutical companies because they represented potentially large revenue opportunities.

​

None of these decisions were irrational. But when the organisation stepped back and examined where it created the greatest differentiated value, a different picture emerged. Its agility — a disadvantage when competing for the attention of the largest pharmaceutical companies — was a meaningful advantage for smaller and mid‑sized biotechnology organisations that valued responsiveness, flexibility, and specialist support.

​

The issue was not simply messaging. It was whether the business was competing where its strengths mattered most.

​

When one or two significant legacy customers were eventually lost, the impact was immediate. The losses did not create the vulnerability. They exposed it.

​

When the Proxy Replaces the Purpose

Commercial drift often develops when an organisation gradually begins optimising for something that was originally intended only as an indicator of progress.

​

Visibility becomes the objective rather than visibility among the right customers. Lead volume becomes the objective rather than qualified commercial opportunities. Conference attendance becomes the objective rather than productive customer engagement. Pipeline value becomes the objective rather than the quality and probability of the opportunities within it. Product launch becomes the objective rather than customer adoption.

​

Metrics matter. Organisations need evidence, accountability, and clarity. But metrics do more than measure behaviour — they influence it. When the proxy quietly becomes the purpose, local success can coexist with commercial drift.

​

Strategy Cannot Live in the Annual Presentation

Most organisations have a strategy. Fewer use strategy as a decision discipline.

​

A leadership team can spend weeks developing an annual plan. Functions can create detailed objectives. Presentations can be delivered. Budgets can be approved. And then everyone can return to work.

​

Strategy prevents drift only when it continues to influence everyday decisions.

​

Which customers should receive our attention? Which opportunities should we decline? Which markets should we prioritise? Which product investments best support the outcomes our customers value? Where should limited resources go? What evidence would cause us to change direction?

​

If the strategy presented in January has little influence over the decisions being made in March, June, or October, it risks becoming documentation rather than direction.

Alignment is not centralisation. It is shared commercial understanding.

​

Drift Is Not Agility

Markets change. Customers evolve. Competitors adapt. Technologies improve. Unexpected opportunities appear. A business that tests every decision against an inflexible plan risks becoming slow, bureaucratic, and disconnected from reality.

​

That is not commercial discipline. It is commercial rigidity.

​

Strong commercial foundations should make an organisation more capable of adapting, not less. The starting point is clarity:

​

Who are our priority customers? What outcomes matter to them? What is their current status quo? Why is changing that status quo worthwhile? Where do our capabilities create distinctive value? Why are we better positioned than the alternatives?

​

These answers create a foundation for commercial decision-making. They do not create a permanent answer. When evidence changes, the organisation should be willing to reconsider its segmentation, value proposition, positioning, product priorities, investment, messaging, or route to market.

​

Commercial agility is deliberate adaptation. Commercial drift is accumulated disconnection.

​

​

​

​

The Early Warning Signs of Drift

If declining revenue is a lagging indicator, leaders need to recognise what happens earlier. The first warning signs rarely appear on a dashboard. They appear in how the organisation communicates, shares information, and makes decisions.

​

Fragmented information

Marketing sees one version of the market. Sales sees another. Product sees a third. Valuable insight held by Account Management rarely reaches those making investment decisions. Operations understands a delivery constraint that Business Development discovers only after an opportunity progresses.

​

The issue is not the volume of information. It is whether relevant commercial insight reaches the people whose decisions depend upon it.

​

Decisions made in isolation

A Marketing decision affects Sales. A pricing decision affects positioning. A Product decision affects the value proposition. A Business Development opportunity affects Operations. Drift begins when decisions are made without recognising their commercial consequences beyond the originating function.

​

Functional territorialism

“My customer.” “My budget.” “My campaign.” “My product.” “My target.”

​

This behaviour is understandable when functions are measured primarily against their own objectives. But it encourages local optimisation even when a different decision would create greater enterprise value.

​

Unexamined assumptions

Every strategy contains assumptions — about customers, demand, competitors, regulation, channels, capacity, and technology. The objective is not to prepare for every imaginable event. It is to understand which assumptions matter enough that, if they proved wrong, the commercial consequences would be significant.

​

Commercial resilience begins by understanding vulnerability before circumstances expose it.

 

The Customer Remains the Ultimate Test

An organisation can communicate effectively. Functions can be aligned. Processes can be disciplined. Data can flow freely. Everyone can understand the strategy.

​

And the organisation can still move efficiently in the wrong direction.

​

Internal alignment is valuable only when it remains connected to external reality. The ultimate test of commercial value sits with the customer.

​

Do we understand the problem they are trying to solve? Is the outcome we offer sufficiently valuable to justify the cost, effort, disruption, and risk of changing? Does our differentiation matter to them - or merely to us? Has their definition of value changed?

​

Customer evidence must remain part of the commercial decision system. It helps organisations recognise when assumptions are weakening, when priorities are shifting, and when yesterday’s value proposition is becoming tomorrow’s commercial drift.

​

Restoring Commercial Direction

Recognising commercial drift does not require a major transformation programme. Nor does it automatically require a new CRM, organisational restructure, reporting system, or cross‑functional committee.

​

Start by reconnecting the organisation to its commercial fundamentals:

​

Who are the customers we are trying to serve? How should they be segmented and prioritised? What outcomes matter to them? What are they doing today? Why should they change? Where do we create distinctive value? Why should they choose us? And critically: are our answers still supported by evidence?

​

Then examine how that commercial intent moves through the organisation. What information is not being communicated? Where are decisions being made without sufficient context? Which measures encourage local optimisation? Which processes create friction? Which assumptions go unchallenged?

​

Only then should the organisation decide what needs to change.

​

Sometimes the answer is better data. Sometimes it is clearer segmentation, stronger customer insight, a revised value proposition, different performance measures, clearer decision rights, or better internal communication. And sometimes it is simply a small number of capable people having the right commercial conversation more frequently.

​

Diagnose first. Intervene second.

​

Five Questions for Leadership Teams

 

Commercial drift is easier to prevent than to reverse. Five questions are particularly useful:

​

1. Can our commercial leaders clearly agree on who our priority customers are, what they value, and why they should choose us? If different functions provide materially different answers, the organisation may already be operating from different commercial assumptions.

2. Are the major decisions being made across functions reinforcing the same commercial outcomes — or merely achieving functional objectives? Local success does not always create enterprise value.

3. Does relevant customer, market, competitive, operational, and performance insight reach the people whose decisions depend upon it? The objective is not more information. It is better decision‑relevant insight.

4. Which assumptions underpin our current growth, and what would happen if one of the most important stopped being true? Understanding vulnerability before it becomes performance decline creates options.

5. What are we currently measuring and rewarding, and could any of those measures be encouraging activity or local success at the expense of the commercial outcome we actually want? Metrics should support commercial intent, not quietly replace it.

 

The value of these questions is not in producing perfect answers. It is in revealing where the organisation may no longer share the same commercial logic.

​

From Drift to Momentum

Commercial drift is not corrected by asking people to work harder. More activity can accelerate drift when different parts of the organisation are optimising towards different outcomes.

​

The alternative is better‑connected decision-making.

​

Clear commercial intent. Relevant customer and market insight. Shared understanding across functions. Enough autonomy for decisions to be made where the best knowledge exists. Enough communication for interconnected decisions to reinforce one another. Enough humility to recognise when new evidence means the strategy should change.

When those conditions exist, commercial decisions begin to compound in the opposite direction.

​

Better customer choices sharpen positioning. Clearer positioning improves messaging. Better messaging improves customer conversations. Better conversations generate better insight. Better insight improves the next decision.

​

That is commercial momentum — the cumulative effect of better commercial decisions reinforcing one another over time.

​

Commercial drift begins when those connections weaken. The challenge for leadership is not simply to recognise when performance has declined. It is to recognise when the organisation is beginning to move away from its commercial intent — before the numbers make the problem impossible to ignore.

​

Because by then, the drift may have been underway for a very long time.

​

And the most important commercial decision may be to reconnect the organisation before circumstances force it to.